Hobnobbing

A few days before last Thursday, I received a call. “Hey Dan, there’s a meeting of the International Food Information Council this week at the Pioneer Campus in Johnston. All the major food companies like Kraft, Pepsi, Coke, Nestle, General Mills, etc. will have executives there. On Thursday evening for dinner they would like to have a farmer join each table to talk about agricultural production practices. Would you have any interest?”

“You bet,” I said.

So when Thursday arrived, I found myself in the middle of the bustling suburb of Johnston, right next to the Public Library, on an old farmstead looking decidedly out of place and yet beautiful at the same time. There were twelve Iowa farms represented either by individuals or couples, and we made introductions and small talk awaiting the bus of the said executives to pull up.

We were gathered on a deck outside the hay mow of an old barn. In this hay mow was to be dinner, and a bluegrass group was setting up in one corner of it. In another corner they were setting up the beer. While they did, we ventured into the same conversation farmers have anywhere. Asking each other about the weather and their crops. You could have gathered us all at the steps of Mt Kilimanjaro, and in no less than five minutes we would have got to the same conversation we were now engaged in here in Johnston, on the remnant of a farm.

By us on the deck stood another little, tidy bar. This one only sported champagne glasses. I waited by it to see what the group we were waiting on would do. If they all went for the champagne, I would begrudgingly join them, but should any pass it and go for the beer, my big Irish nose would thank them for not having to spend the evening trying to fit itself into one of those champagne glasses.

The bus arrived, and as they made their way from the parking lot I felt a little nervous for the first time. All of them were bound to have titles of one sort or another. I had none. The feeling was no different than if I had forgotten to put my pants on. Surely I could find some title to bestow on myself too. Suddenly it came to me. I had made myself viceroy of farm drainage and cattle operations. Dad became our chief operating officer, and my mother the supreme allied commander. Doubtful I should be meeting any of those that evening.

If I cracked a smile at my success, it was short lived. A second later I heard from a boisterous blonde, “Oh my God, it’s a farmer. Can I take your picture?” So much for being a viceroy. Evidently the cowboy boots had given it away. I wanted to tell her a better photo opportunity might come should I need to fit this nose in a champagne glass, but I relented and let her take it anyway. As she did, I noticed some of the executives passing up the champagne for a beer. Victory had not been elusive entirely.

In the beer line I was standing behind a gentlemen about my age, tall, incredibly fit, well dressed, and with a perfectly square jaw. He introduced himself and told me he was with Kraft. He lived in Chicago, had three kids, and over a beer we began talking of the Chicago Bulls. Somewhere in the process, Ernest came over, also from Chicago. He was with Mondelez, which is how Kraft was known around the rest of the world, until it had recently spun off. I asked them what they liked about their jobs.

“The thing with our companies is that work is so varied. Some others make chiefly one product, but with us you’re at a macaroni and cheese place one day, chocolate production the next, and processing cheese on the third. It’s always something different. I suppose that’s what you like about farming.” I concurred.

“What do you guys raise, Dan? Corn and soybeans?” asked Ernest.

“Actually cattle,” I replied. “Dad really enjoyed the cattle, so when I went to college I took Agronomy classes to sort of balance him out on the crop side. Within a few years of my return, I found I really liked the cattle too. Mom and Dad rented the crop ground out and we focused on the cows and conservation work.”

“What did you grow to like about the cattle?”

“I don’t know to tell you the truth. There’s just something about them. It’s not like raising a commodity; they’re different. There is a connection with the herd. Down our way there are plenty of people that do something else for a job, but maintain a few cows. Some of them are doctors and lawyers here in Des Moines. There’s a sort of fascination with them that doesn’t exist with a field of corn.”

Everyone started to take their tables, so I took mine with them. The lady who had taken my picture joined us, along with three others.

“So what’s the biggest challenge you farmers face today, Dan?” Ernest continued.

“Well in my opinion, the biggest challenge we face is the growing disconnect between why we do what we do, and why the consumer thinks we do what we do. The second, I guess, would be the ability to transfer current operations to the next generation. It is so capital intensive, it will be a challenge for heirs that want to farm to be able to buy out or come to an agreement with the non-farming ones.”

“We struggle with those challenges too, Dan. Your first point certainly, but your second one as well. It’s a particular issue with cocoa and coffee. No one would believe food companies wonder where their cocoa is going to come from, but we do. Most of it comes from small, family run operations, and we are losing them at an unbelievably rapid rate as their children prefer to work in town. We are trying to figure out as an industry how to keep the next generation on them instead.”

“Speaking to your first point, have you seen ‘Food, Inc.?’” asked the woman whom had taken my photo. “Yes,” I replied. “It’s quite a picture that’s painted there, isn’t it?” she continued. “Monsanto, for instance, forcing upon you farmers genetically modified crops. But that isn’t what happened is it?”

“No,” I said, “I was still farming our row crop acres when Roundup Ready soybeans came out. We gradually planted more and more acres to them. We did so because it made good economic sense. They weren’t forced on us. It was a good product and we chose it. It’s the same with BT corn.”

“Yes, but you see what happens when there is that disconnect? All of the sudden someone else steps in and begins to tell the rest of the world what your motives are, whether they are or not. As consumers have become more interested about where their food comes from, our panel has become more interested, and I can tell you in our travels we’ve found a lot that hasn’t been what it was purported to be. We’re fortunate, but not many consumers get such an opportunity. You guys need to do a better job getting your story out there.”

“Well, we are trying,” I said, “but there is a learning curve. Until the most recent generation, all we’ve ever had to be is farmers, you know? In the time prior most Americans, in one way or another, had a family connection to the farm via their grandparents or aunts and uncles. With that connection came an understanding, and people knew where their food came from. That’s not the case anymore. We are trying to figure out what we can do about that.”

“So are we,” she said. “I use to work for the Food and Drug Administration. When I left I had the option to go into pharmaceuticals or food. I chose food. People told me I was crazy. Pharmaceuticals were more profitable, but pharmaceuticals didn’t interest me. They are pretty cut and dried. As Americans we want our drugs. You see a commercial for some drug on television, and at the end of it is two things. One is a narrator quickly reading a list of scientifically proven side effects as long as your arm. The other is this surreal image of a sailboat going across a wheat field. When it’s over, we all decide we want the drug, side effects be damned.

Our decisions on food, on the other hand, have much more complex emotions going into them. Take your GMOs. I won’t argue with you that they are proven safe, but what is battled is their perception by the consumer. The consumer’s perception is just like yours or mine. It is fickle. There are countless research studies that show that. If we label a food “processed,” it has a negative connotation. If we label it “packaged,” it’s okay. We can do the same thing with “genetically modified” vs. “FDA approved.” Now however we label it doesn’t change what it is in the least, but it certainly changes how it is perceived, and I find that incredibly interesting.

Speaking just for myself, I battle a couple of things with what we are doing as an industry. First, in an effort to feed into the consumer’s desired perception, we’ve started slapping labels on everything. You might have noticed “gluten-free” lately. We are putting it on items that never had gluten in them to begin with. Then we have non-GMO, all natural, and organic. These are all different. Every time someone somewhere has a new concern, we slap a label on our label. Pretty soon we are going to run out of real estate. That is one, and it is simply practical.

My second concern is an ethical one. Some of these processes, or lack thereof, substantially impact the cost of the product. While I certainly think the consumer should have a choice in the marketplace, there is an element of an elitist mentality trying to limit it for others. I balk at requiring all consumers to spend more for something science has shown no value for, especially if they don’t have it to spend. It’s off-base to me.”

“Not to mention the impact it has on those in developing nations we export to.” I added.

“Yes, but you know what? You farmers like to talk about how you feed the world, but any study of consumers will show that is the last thing on our minds when we visit the grocery store. Sure, we all like to talk a good game about how we care about what is happening in a developing country, but study after study show’s it plays virtually no role in why we purchase what we purchase.”

“I know. I’ve seen those same studies. As farmers, we’ve traditionally approached it in a way that isn’t making a connection. For the consumer it is about price, quality, and safety. The ‘feeding the world’ bit just doesn’t seem to have an impact with them.”

Dinner was being served family style, and while her and I were talking, we had been grazing on a caesar salad and a dish of beets, cubed and mixed with something resembling dandelion leaves and sunflower seeds. As the beets made their way around a second time, the tall man from Kraft commented, “Beets are the next big thing, you know.” I chuckled. “No, really. All the restaurants on the east coast are working them into their menus. They are the new kohlrabi. You wait and see.”

Soon the sides and the main course arrived, and I tried to remember the proper procedure for passing the dish around. Offer to the left and pass to the right, right? I debated this quietly, until a dish was finally placed in front of me to distribute. As I grabbed it, I realized I was in the middle of two other dishes approaching from either side. I put mine into rotation behind the one I thought it most went with, and let form follow function.

(Meanwhile the salt and pepper, which Mary Foley Balvanz had always instructed are married, seemed to have met with an unfortunate separation. Salt had flew the coup and was in the process of gallivanting around the countryside, with random partners, while the pepper, meanwhile, stayed dejectedly under the centerpiece and wept.)

It was through the salt that I met Michelle, seated two seats away and beside Ernest. “You know I’m a farm girl from East Texas,” she proudly told me. “We still have the farm my grandfather and grandmother started. All of us cousins own it as shares. We all make general decisions from time to time, and I enjoy that, but I figured I would never be bothered with the day to day of a farm again. That is until recently.”

“What happened?” I asked.

“Well believe it or not, all of the sudden my husband has this crazy idea that he would like to have cattle.”

Ernest kicked me under the table, wearing a large grin. “I told you,” I said. “Everyone would like to have a cow herd someday.” Had Ernest been in town a little longer, I would have had to get him some boots.

Desert was a rhubarb cobbler with ice cream in a mason jar. I took another small victory in the fact that I ate it without wearing it. I soon realized the white tablecloth was less fortunate. It looked like a crime scene missing its chalk line. Before anyone else noticed, it was time for them to board the bus and go.

As a little farmer, I found comfort in their previous willingness to inquire about agriculture, and the understanding they had as a result of it. I was also appreciative of the added understanding they gave me. Underneath the titles of executive or viceroy, holding a beer bottle or champagne glass, and in living an urban existence or a rural one, we were just people. Perhaps the capacities I observed from them were just as capable to be found elsewhere as the topics of weather and crops in a conversation among farmers.

There is an old saying which states the farm market is ruled by both reality and perception. You can have a perfect understanding of reality, and take a position in the market based on that, but if you have forgotten about perception it will come along and kick you in the butt. I suppose you will find yourself eating cubed beets with sunflower seeds and dandelion leaves. Seems the food business is the same way. Here’s to finding a balance someday.

The Veteran

Last Friday found me in a hurry in Winterset around noon.  When you are in a hurry in Winterset, you go to Hardees.  Why that is, I don’t know.  There are several things that are faster—sit down restaurants for one—a doctor’s office—molasses in January.  Most of the faster options require you to get out of your car.  No one has time for that when they are in a hurry.  No, when you are in a hurry in Winterset, you go to Hardees and wait.

This particular visit started very promising, however.  As soon as the woman said, “Hi,” I asked for a “Western Bacon Thickburger, in a small combo with a diet coke.”  For a moment I left her speechless.  She couldn’t ask me if I wanted it in a combo, nor if I wanted to upsize it, nor what I wanted to drink.  I had snatched all those away from her.  Instead all I had left for her to tell me was the total, which she did, and to ask me to pull around, which I did.

I was getting ready to report the feat to the people at Guinness Records, but when I rounded the building I found a beautiful red Cadillac parked 5 feet away from the drive up window with its door opened.  I parked behind it and dejectedly put my phone back in my pocket.

Looking ahead, I could see a knee that made a swinging attempt to free itself from the inside of the car only to come circling back again.  It was not unlike a metronome, and the attempts were sufficient for me to place it in waltz time, hearing my old high school band instructor counting 1-2-3, 1-2-3, 1-2-3 from the recesses of my mind.  Finally, instead of a knee, came an outstretched, frail arm, which trembled in double time and reached to grasp the pant leg of the foot that wouldn’t budge.

The man had short sleeves on, and on his forearm one could just make out the wide black lines that were the final remnants of an old tattoo.  Judging by his age, which I would have guessed in the 90s, he acquired it somewhere in World War II.  My hurry became less important, and I began to wonder, given his age and frailty, how he would be able to muster up enough grip to pull this foot free by the pant leg.  What I had failed to take into account, however, was the strength of his will.  This had got him through the war 70 years ago and was what had recently powered him out his driveway, down the few blocks to Hardees, middle-eastern oil be damned.  His trembling fingers squeezed the back of his pant leg and pulled the foot free from the car’s body.

His arms were 90.  His will was not.

He tried to stand up but was unable.  So he sat on the edge of the seat crossways and leant as far out the open door as he could.  The gal inside leant out the drive up window down to her waist.  She passed him his drink, which I waited to splatter on the pavement between them, but no, sheer will won the war again.  Change was made in the same manner, and then she asked him to pull ahead.  Getting back in was as big of a feat as getting out was, but he managed, all the same.

As I came up to take his place, the woman’s loud voice boomed, “I’m not so sure that old man ought to be driving.  He didn’t even order at the screen.”  How his failing to order at the screen was the biggest red flag for her was beyond me.  I waited for my food while he waited for the rest of his.  Looking ahead, I could see his clear eyes looking back at me through his big eye glasses and the rear view.  His window was down.

The gal inside had assumed the old man simply hadn’t the capacity to know that he shouldn’t be driving, that he was unaware of his own limitations.  It might have been true, I suppose, and were it it would be something in common he shared with the rest of us, all unaware of our own limitations and puttering around anyway.  But as for me, I thought his eyes spoke to something different and fancied instead that he knew what he was doing.

Whatever loss he had seen in service, he himself had survived to witness another 70 years of it. By now he had outlived nearly all of his friends and was seeing their children and perhaps his own die of old age.  While old age had forgot about him, time continued to work and each day took a little more of what was once his.  Perhaps he understood that giving up driving altogether was giving up his lone out now.  He saw it for what it was, the loss of the freedom he had once thought he was fighting for.

From time to time, then, he fought still, to charge the light brigade down to Hardees.

This made it look courageous in a way.  Yes, it was the type of courage that could get someone killed, but by now he had seen his fair share of that.  Besides, I wasn’t worried; I met him parked.  Prior to meeting him, perhaps I had forgot about him, just as most of the world and old age had.  The red Cadillac was a flare letting the world know he was in fact still here and waiting at Hardees like the rest of us.

Disappointments

At times what she felt was similar to what a father once felt, having convinced himself during her first few years that his only child was a genius, only for the next years to pass in a trickle of report cards pointing to something else. Instead, her school years had revealed her to be amiable, strong willed, athletic, and a remarkable sense of empathy for those that were feeling down. All those things, however, just wouldn’t answer for all the investment he had made on behalf of genius.

Although that investment had been a bust, his investment in disappointment was a cash cow. Disappointment bred disappointment, and he always reinvested its proceeds for future earnings. When he finally died, he had left it all to her, his lone survivor.

The profits would continue to multiply, and on some dark days she’d sit and count them. Unlike her father she was humble about her wealth, so she counted them alone and never spoke of the matter.

The man standing in the bathroom doorway loved her without knowing any of this, and wistfully thought afterwards that had he known he would have loved her even more. He wouldn’t have loved her more, of course, but perhaps he could have loved her better.

The report card may have adequately reflected her ability in comprehending school, but it was of no account in her capacity to comprehend the world outside it. She didn’t go to college, and this was a shame. Fools did, and they became educated fools. She would have had much more to show for it than that.

Her view of the world left her conflicted, with questions she could hardly phrase, let alone answer. Her inability to do either simply reinforced what she had been indoctrinated with from square one. Namely, that she was not a genius. Were she, she mistakenly dreamed, things would be so much easier. After all, she thought, it seemed easier for others. It never occurred to her that it was only easy for the cowards, and the rest just faked it.

Her old man had exactly what he had wished for, but he was too simple to understand it, and she had no one else to tell her she was profound.

Where she found herself now, however, was well past those long ago years. She was sitting at the head of his bed, wearing only one of his dress shirts, partly buttoned and hanging loosely on her. She sat on top of the covers with three pillows shoved behind her back, her knees pulled up to her chin, and her feet together. On each knee rested one of her hands, and between them were the loose papers representing the day’s output. She was read it intently as he stood in the doorway with his toothbrush hanging out of his mouth idle.

Looking at her in the lamplight, he remembered how he once believed that one day he’d grow older and find that beauty was only for the young. Here he was, approaching 50, and there beauty was, sitting at the head of his bed. Her long hair may have lost the color of its youth, but it had gained something more. It had aged gracefully. It spilled down in waves from her head, fell gently upon her shoulders and made its way down to her chest. It framed her long, slender fingers, which framed the dress shirt, whose plunging neckline framed a smooth, flat chest, all of which lied behind his few pages of the day’s work. It was a shame the day’s work was in its way.

Suddenly she looked up at him, a large grin affixed to her face, “Oh my God,” she said, “I love it! How do you do that?”

He resumed brushing his teeth. “Do you think it could actually happen that way?” he asked from the corner of his mouth.

She quickly shook her head side to side a little, as though she were in disbelief that he had asked, and said enthusiastically, “Well, yea. I mean I bet it has already happened this way, a hundred times I’m sure, and if not, then it will.” This was the reassurance he was looking for.

As far as writers go, he was okay. Most of the time he was too caught up in his own happenings to get the perspective really good writing required.  The times he wasn’t, he squandered.  But sometimes he wrote beyond what he was capable of. This was one of those times.

“You are absolutely beautiful, you know?” he said. “I couldn’t write the way you look now, sitting there on my bed.”

“This quit being your bed a few months ago,” she chided him, “though I could fix that for you, if you would like.”

“Absolutely not. I want you to stay right there.”

“I want you to finish brushing your goddamn teeth.”

Jesus Christ Almighty, he thought, please let us stay happy. I’ve done my work. I’ve put in my time. Let this work. Don’t let me screw this up.

Pulling the covers back, she was thinking the same thing. After they got into bed together, after they had made love, just before they closed their eyes, they spoke of their hopes, each taking their own turn. In them they were united, but in their silent, hidden doubts they were alone.

The Importance of Being Ernest

My high school English teacher had three names, and used them all nearly always. It was eccentric, perhaps. Sometimes she would exchange her first name for Ms., though she was married, and we all knew it. Once it crossed my mind that perhaps she didn’t, however. Seems doubtful that pertinent fact would have escaped her, but pertinent facts always escape us. It’s difficult to figure out why married people do what they do anyway. Perhaps she thought Ms. had a nice ring to it. I should drop it.

I took a novels class with her, and beyond achieving full mastery of the finite knowledge of her name, I would master little else in there. I did make a lot of introductions, however, and at some point I read a book of Ernest Hemingway’s, The Old Man and the Sea. Having bounced around from author to author prior, I quickly came to devour every last book of his on her shelves.

I had no clue what I was reading, but I liked it. Something similar to falling in love, I suppose.

Finally she said to me one day, “Dan, I appreciate and admire your appetite for Hemingway, but you really ought to try to read something else. There are lots of other great authors out there, and I would think the themes of Hemingway would be a little shallow for you.”

“What do you mean?” I asked.

“Well, Hemingway is so full of himself. He’s all about being macho and brave. It wears a little thin, don’t you think? Besides, he doesn’t write women very well.” And with that I dropped him, for the most part, until a college class with a Jewish Rabbi named Jay Holstein.

Holstein was the darling of the underclassmen. He was a professor of religion, and for him religion was about the pursuit of knowledge and understanding. Hardly a semester went by which didn’t see an article or two in the school newspaper devoted to him. After my time someone even made a film about him. Over the years he had managed to weave together a few eccentricities of his own which had created quite a character for himself.

He had this distinct way of dropping his book bag, clipping on his mic, and jumping right into a lecture. He rarely stood still, and most of his time was spent pacing, strutting like a cock in the henhouse. When he did stop, he carried himself with the demeanor of a drill instructor, standing perfectly erect, on the balls of his feet, ready to spring at a moment’s notice. Instruction was delivered with an almost staccato method, each syllable annunciated to its fullest, and an occasional stutter or curse word added to help keep the beat. Beyond this he also possessed a keen wit.

I adored him too, and as a sophomore I had snuck my way onto the roll of one of his honor seminars. One day, across the grease board which spanned the room, he wrote, “How can you teach what can only be learned?” When he had placed the pen down, he turned and began to tell us of Ernest Hemingway.

“You know I was in class once, and I was right in the middle of telling everyone what a pompous ass Ernest Hemingway was. I was making my way to the front of the room, with my back turned to you all, when suddenly, some kid in the back blurted out, ‘You’re full of shit, and you don’t know what the hell you are talking about.’”

As he continued to describe the incident, I could see it in my mind completely. Holstein spun, pointed a dictatorial finger in the general direction from where the comment came, and demanded to know who said that in the short, annunciated style that would surely quell any rebellion in the ranks.

“I did,” came the response, “and it is true. You’re full of shit and you don’t know what the hell you’re talking about.” This had to have made an impression on Holstein, whom underneath the pomp and circumstance perhaps wondered whether or not he was full of shit and if he did know what the hell he was talking about. I think we wonder this of ourselves, anyway, and I would expect no less of him. He maintained a dramatic pause with a constant glare, which seemed as though it was anything but the hesitation it was.

“I think we need to talk about this after class,” came the terse response, giving the appearance of impending disciplinary action, while covertly giving him a less public opportunity to sort it all out. What this predecessor of ours had told him afterwards, I don’t know, nor ever will, but it was enough that Holstein began reading Hemingway again, and now, years later, we were going to as well.

I would hate to keep such an opportunity from you either.

It was an important time for me. At 20, I was finally going to read for the first time, and by that I mean Holstein was going to ask that we engage a story not from the perspective that whatever it meant to us was the important thing. We were going to engage it from the perspective of trying to figure out what the author had to say. As I got my first look of what he had to say and the skill in which he said it, it was going to dash any hope I had of being a writer.

“The Hemingway story I’ve selected for this class is ‘The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber.’”

The story is about a husband and his wife, on a big game African Safari with a white, English guide. There’s shooting, and loving, and cursing, and drinking, which are all the makings of an autobiography for the man who penned it. It was written in 1936 and ran in Cosmopolitan Magazine. This was before Cosmo became concerned with the 50 Secrets to the Greatest Sex Ever, finding the G spot (which I would think would have been included in the 50), and all the innumerable ways to tell if he’s cheating.

Having published these secrets once, one would think the story would be out and there would be no demand for Cosmo to follow up. Evidently that is wrong, and all these secrets are required to be republished every two or three months. One might get the idea that these secrets have a secret themselves. This was not lost on Hemingway, pompous ass or not. We can get a glimpse of it too, if we choose.

You can find the text for free in the following places:

A PDF version here: http://www.tarleton.edu/Faculty/sword/Short%20Story/The%20Short%20Happy%20Life%20of%20Francis%20Macomber.pdf

A web based version here:  http://www15.uta.fi/FAST/US1/REF/macomber.html

And if your bookshelf sports a copy of the Complete Short Stories of Ernest Hemingway, you’ll find it as story number one. I would guess it would take 45 minutes to read, and what follows would make little sense without it. If you do so, you will find the athletic and vibrant sentences which made the old man famous, and though he’s long since dead, you’ll find they still live as though they were born yesterday. In fact, if you do read it, you’ll find they were born sooner than yesterday, for they’ll be born again in you.

“If I’m a reader, beginning a story, the first thing I might ask is ‘Why did this author write?’ What good does it do Hemingway to write?” Thinking the question rhetorical, we offered no response other than blank stares, and so he continued, “Writing is a grasp at death. It is a grasp at death because it is a creative act.

I will always bring an assumption to the literature at hand, be it the Bible, or Hemingway, or anyone else. This assumption is what makes possible reading and understanding, and it is simply this: authors are people like you and me. They wrestled with the same questions as our ancient counterparts, one of them being whether we are capable of love, love being a mutual caring made possible by the notion that we are capable of some level of selflessness.

In life we have a hang up with selflessness.  It’s our own selfishness. We need other people. How would we know if an act were selfless?” This question was met with blank stares as well, and so he continued, “Intent. It is not what characters do in a story that’s important, but it is why they do it. What we are looking for is access to the intent of the character. Now who can tell me how Robert Wilson feels about the lion?”

Finally the stares gave way to murmurs, which eventually gave voice to terms like ‘respect,’ ‘trophy,’ and ‘honorable.” Holstein jotted the submissions down as they came, with his back to us, when finally, our own kid in the back said simply, “He loves it.”

At that statement, Holstein wheeled, extended his hand with his thumb folded across his palm and his other four fingers straight ahead, and said appraisingly, “You’re God damn right.  He loves it.  Did Hemingway need to say, ‘He loves it?’  No.  We can figure that out on our own.  So why is Wilson killing what he loves? That’s what this story is about, why the hell do we as humans kill what we love and is there a better way?

What about our author? Where is Hemingway in this story? Where is the author in any story? By that I mean what do we have that we know comes from them? We have the title and the names. This is all we can be sure the author is dealing with us directly in, and in them the author may or may not be dealing with us straight.

Is Hemingway with Wilson? Is Wilson our hero? Is Wilson beyond fault and always correct? Did Mrs. Macomber murder her own husband?”

“No,” I timidly said, taking my turn on the block.

“How the hell do you know that?”

“The narrator tells us she shot at the buffalo.”

This time the four fingers came in my direction. “That’s right. The narrator tells us she shot at the God damn buffalo. What else does this narrator give us and can we trust him or her to be straight with us?”

Now, nearly twenty years later, taking up the hunt of my own lion again, I find the narrator gives us an awful lot. Within the first couple of pages we get the progression of names for Macomber’s wife: Mrs. Macomber, Margaret, and Margot. These change for a reason. The narrator also describes her alone as being ‘handsome.’ In his or her description of all the other main characters, animal and human, eventually their eyes get mentioned. Hers our narrator makes no such note of. In the first few pages we also come across a series of unreturned smiles which will almost continue throughout the piece. Additionally, we get our first reference to a photograph, which we will return to in the middle and at the end of the story.

It’s the narrator which gives us the proverb that will come to challenge Wilson’s own motto. It’s the narrator whom lets us know that where the Macombers find themselves in their marriage is no one individual’s fault.  It’s the narrator that gives us the tribe of the gun bearers, a tribe which has a particular social custom concerning names. It’s the narrator that links the dirtiness of Wilson, whom Francis will call a swine, to the dirty, pig eyed buffs at the end. It’s the same narrator that let us know what Macomber is feeling at the end is a sort of drunkenness, which implies that were he to have lived, he’d sober.

What the narrator doesn’t give us is that Hemingway, wounded in World War I, laid in a hospital bed beside an injured British soldier whom pulled that Shakespeare quote out of his breast pocket to read it to our author. Nor do they give us that Hemingway thought him the biggest horse’s ass he’d ever met in his life.

Should you venture into reading the literary criticism of the story, in most of it you will find little of what the narrator gives us mentioned. Instead you will find the commentary that labels the white hunter, Wilson, as Hemingway’s hero, Macomber as the hero in training, and his wife as the feminine component that always kills masculinity as it asserts itself. It will not only be presented as the critic’s opinion, but as that of Hemingway himself, and so it is used to support an opinion of him similar to that which my English teacher and Holstein once shared. Evidently critics read no better than the rest of us, though they write commentary by the hundreds, most of which is indistinguishable from the next.

Hemingway’s famous quote about writing is, “If a writer of prose knows enough of what he is writing about he may omit things that he knows and the reader, if the writer is writing truly enough, will have a feeling of those things as strongly as though the writer had stated them. The dignity of movement of an iceberg is due to only one-eighth of it being above water.” He took pride in the great deal he omitted, and the critic takes pride at thinking they know what it was.  If their feet aren’t wet, however, we are free to have our suspicions. We might know what he omitted, though, if we’re divers. The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber is at a depth that will take nothing less.

In the following I make no claims at having gotten a full glimpse. I will only say that young and in this class with Holstein I first got some sense of its immense bulk. When I did, I bolted like a rabbit.  Now I’m trying to do better.

Margaret’s husband’s most endearing human quality, once he was stripped of his confidence, was his vulnerability.  Both she and her husband hated it.  Wilson seems to find himself admiring at times, perhaps since it was a capacity he long ago lost. When Francis finally rids himself of it, there is a nearly remorseless quality that takes its place.  It is one that we seem to find in Wilson.  I think, in giving us the title, Ernest is indicating that were it not a short life, it wouldn’t have been a happy one for its namesake.  It certainly doesn’t look like it’s been a happy one for Wilson.  Francis is killed feeling all the elation of having got to someplace new, without suffering the consequences that come from its being someplace worse.

As I read it, it is with Margaret, whose name means pearl, that Hemingway’s sympathies lie.  She is the only one that seems to have truly engaged in the self-critical thinking Hemingway is writing and engaging in himself.  She seems to have contemplated how her own actions have pushed her husband to where he’s at, possibly about to get himself killed, and feels remorse.  Despite all the previous wounds and not knowing whether he will leave her or not, she shoots anyway to save him, for she loves him.  In doing so, she alone acts selflessly.

It so happened luck intervened, and the first effort any of our characters make to quit killing what they love, winds up doing just that. The truest heroism lies unrecognized by its biggest braggart in Wilson and by most critics, neither of whom have the courage to look critically at themselves.